THE QUEST FOR PATENTABILITY OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INVENTIONS. AN ALBANIAN LAW PERSPECTIVE
doi: https://doi.org/10.56461/iup_rlrc.2026.7.ch1
Technological breakthroughs have often challenged traditional perceptions of legal institutions. It was the industrial revolution that led to the need for internationalization of patent law, with the first wave marked by the Paris Convention of 1883. Similarly, it can be reasonably expected that the involvement of artificial intelligence in the creative domain will most likely trigger the need for regulation of the patentability of works created by artificial intelligence. The traditional perspective on intellectual property law in general, and of patent law in particular, is currently challenged at a local level in various cases regarding whether artificial intelligence-generated outputs can qualify as inventions, who may be recognized as the inventor, and how disclosure and novelty standards should adapt to machine-driven creativity.
This paper examines these issues through the lens of Albanian patent law, situating national provisions within the broader European and international context as well as selected jurisprudence of various states, such as the United States of America. It explores the readiness of the current legal framework to accommodate the challenges raised by artificial intelligence, as well as the potential for regulating this matter under the upcoming artificial intelligence governance legal framework. Ultimately, it argues for a constructive approach that balances legal certainty with technological progress. From a methodological point of view, while I focus my analysis on the Albanian legal framework, particularly on the patent law enacted recently, the discourse is highly relevant for other legal orders as well, inasmuch as the governance of artificial intelligence might be a relevant channel for addressing challenges of patent law.
Keywords: Albania, artificial intelligence, patents, persons.
Albanian Academy of Sciences. 2026. Fjalori i Madh i Gjuhës Shqipe. Tirana. Available at: https://fjalori.online/?search=individ&mode=exact (16. 5. 2026).
Cornish, W. R., Llewelyn, D. & Aplin, T. F. 2019. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trademarks and allied rights. Ninth edition. London: Sweet and Maxwell.
Cottier, T. 2021. Industrial Property, International Protection. In: Peters, A. (ed.) Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Munich: Max Planck Institute. Available at: https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1530
Garner, B. A. (ed.). 2007. Black’s Law Dictionary. 8. ed., 2. repr. St. Paul, Minn.: Thomson/West.
Novelli, C. et al. 2024. Generative AI in EU law: Liability, privacy, intellectual property, and cybersecurity. Computer Law & Security Review, 55, 106066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106066
Government of Japan Public Relations Office. 2025. Act on Promotion of Research and Development, and Utilization of Artificial Intelligence-related Technology Now in Full Effect. Enjoying Japan’s Markets. Tokyo. Available at: https://www.gov-online.go.jp/hlj/en/november_2025/november_2025-08.html (15. 5. 2026).
Rough, E. 2026. AI regulation in the UK. Hg. v. House of Commons Library (Research Briefing, 10003). London: House of Commons Library. Available at: https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-10003/CBP-10003.pdf, updated on 31.03.2026 (13. 5. 2026).
Scambia, N. 2025. AI Inventorship: Recognizing the True Inventors Requires Change. St. John’s Law Review, 98(6), pp. 1209–1233. Available at: https://research.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=aaf6af5e-409c-3515-84d4-26a328f1e1b4
Wachter, S. 2024. Limitations and Loopholes in the EU AI Act and AI Liability Directives: What This Means for the European Union, the United States, and Beyond. Yale Journal of Law and Technology, 26(3), pp. 671–718. Available at: https://yjolt.org/limitations-and-loopholes-eu-ai-act-and-ai-liability-directives-what-means-european-union-united
Legal sources and case law
United States Patent Act of 1952.
European Patent Convention (EPC), signed in Munich, Germany, in October 1973.
EU Parliament Resolution 2020. European Parliament resolution of 20 October 2020 on intellectual property rights for the development of artificial intelligence technologies (2020/2015(INI)), OJ C 404, Oct. 6, 2021.
EU Regulation 2024/1689. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No 300/2008, (EU) No 167/2013, (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act) (Text with EEA relevance), OJ L, 2024/1689, July 12, 2024. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj/eng
Thaler v. Vidal 2022. Case 2021-2347 of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.