KEY ASPECTS OF THE IMPACT OF THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF DIGITAL EVIDENCE ON THE EFFICIENCY OF CRIMINAL JUDGMENTS
The legal system must adapt to rapidly evolving technologies, balancing human rights protection, particularly privacy and fair trial rights, with efficient crime prevention. Digital evidence collection requires constitutional compliance, such as obtaining search and interception warrants, while ensuring confidentiality and dignity. A key challenge is maintaining the authenticity of digital evidence through a proper chain of custody and technical expertise to prevent alteration. Digital evidence enhances criminal justice efficiency by enabling rapid data collection and analysis, but challenges like data overload and statutes of limitations persist. The rights of the accused, including defense and presumption of innocence, must be upheld in digital cases amidst global issues like inter-jurisdictional data access and international treaty compliance. This paper examines how digitization has driven global legal systems to adopt digital evidence, highlighting authentication challenges and the need for Bosnian and Herzegovinian legislators to revise laws based on the European Court of Human Rights and Constitutional Court jurisprudence. Through case studies from Bosnian and Herzegovinian courts and prosecutors’ offices, the paper illustrates both effective and problematic practices in handling digital evidence.
Keywords: ddigital evidence, IT expertise, criminal justice, constitutionality, jurisprudence..
Bećirović, A. 2024. Navigating the digital labyrinth: challenges facing the judiciary in “handling” digital evidence. Legal Chronicles, 17(9), pp. 77-82.
Cvijović, O. 1985. The influence of mutual relations between the main procedural subjects on the efficiency of criminal proceedings. Yugoslav Review of Criminology and Criminal Law, 4, pp. 69-79.
Delgado, A. The Impact of Digital Evidence in Today’s Criminal Cases. Aaron & Delgado Associates. Available at: https://www.communitylawfirm.com/blog/impact-digital-evidence-todays-criminal-cases (26. 5. 2025).
Adžajlić Hodžić, M. et al. 2021. Special investigative measures in the practice of courts in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Sarajevo: Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance (DCAF).
Casey, E. 2011. Digital Evidence and Computer Crime – Forensic Science, Computers, and the Internet. Waltham, San Diego, London: Elsevier Academic Press.
Kavazović, M. et al. 2019. Forensic Processing with Digital Evidence in the Practice of Police Agencies in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Criminal Topics, 19(5), pp. 351-388.
Knežević, Z. & Dumanjić E. 2019. Special investigative actions. Sarajevo: The AIRE Centre.
Lakić, L. 2014. Experiences and Perceived Problems in the Application of Prosecutorial Investigation in BiH. In: I. Jovanović & A. Petrović-Jovanović (eds.), Prosecutorial Investigation: Regional Criminal Procedure Legislation and Experiences in Application. Belgrade: OSCE Mission to Serbia, pp. 89-106.
Mrčela M., Tripalo D. & Valković L. 2016. Handbook for participants, Selected chapters of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms – criminal law aspect. Zagreb: Judicial Academy.
Novak, M. 2019. Digital Evidence in Criminal Cases Before the U.S. Courts of Appeal: Trends and Issues for Consideration. Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law, 14(3), pp. 1-42. https://doi.org/10.15394/jdfsl.2019.1609
Opservatorij ljudskih prava: Bosna i Hercegovina. 2012. Pravo na zaštitu privatnog života. Available at: https://opservatorij.wordpress.com/pravo-na-zastitu-privatnog-zivota-08/ (26. 5. 2025).
Sijerčić–Čolić, H. 2008. Krivično procesno pravo. Knj. 1, Krivičnoprocesni subjekti i krivičnoprocesne radnje. Sarajevo: Faculty of Law, University of Sarajevo.
Simović, M. N. 2014. The Concept of Prosecutorial Investigation in the Criminal Procedure Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina: Status and Problems. pp. 43-58. In: I. Jovanović & A. Petrović-Jovanović (eds.), Prosecutorial Investigation: Regional Criminal Procedure Legislation and Experiences in Application. Belgrade: OSCE Mission to Serbia, pp. 43-58.
Stoykova, R. 2023. The right to a fair trial as a conceptual framework for digital evidence rules in criminal investigations, Computer Law & Security Review, 49, pp. 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105801
Legal Sources and case law
A. L. AND E. J. v. France (dec.), European Court of Human Rights, Application no. 44715/20 and 47930/21, judgment of 24. 9. 2024.
Association for European Integration and Human Rights & Ekimdzhiev, European Court of Human Rights, Application no. 62540/00, judgment of 28. 6. 2007.
Big Brother Watch v. the United Kingdom (GC), European Court of Human Rights, judgment of 25. 5. 2021.
Bykov v. Russia, European Court of Human Rights, Application no. 4378/02, judgment of 10. 3. 2009.
Council of Europe. 1950. European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Aneks IV Opšteg okvirnog sporazuma za mir u Bosni i Hercegovini and Official Gazette of Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 25/2009 – Amendment I.
Constitution of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Official Gazette of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 1/1994, 1/1994 – Amendment I, 13/1997 – Amendments II-XXIV, 13/1997 – Amendments XXV and XXVI, 16/2002 – Amendments XXVII-LIV, 22/2002 – Amendments LVI-LXIII, 52/2002 – Amendments LXIV-LXXXVII, 60/2002 – correction of the Amendment LXXXI, 18/2003 – Amendment LXXXVIII, 63/2003 – Amendments LXXXIX-XCIV, 9/2004 – Amandmani XCV-CII, 32/2007 – correction 20/2004 – Amendments CIII and CIV, 33/2004 – Amendment CV, 71/2005 – Amendments CVI-CVIII, 72/2005 – Amendment CVI, 88/2008 – Amendment CIX, 79/2022 – Amendments CX-CXXX, 80/2022 – correction and 31/2023 – Amendment CXXXI.
Constitution of the Republika Srpska, Official Gazette of the Republika Srpska, no. 21/92, 28/94, 8/96, 13/96, 15/96, 16/96, 21/96, 21/02, 26/02, 30/02, 31/02, 69/02, 31/03, 98/03, 115/05, 117/05.
Criminal Procedure Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Official Gazette of Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 3/03, 32/03, 36/03, 26/04, 63/04, 13/05, 48/05, 46/06, 76/06, 29/07, 32/07, 53/07, 76/07, 15/08, 58/08, 12/09, 16/09, 93/09, 72/13, 65/18.
Criminal Procedure Code of the Brčko District of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Official Gazette of the Brčko District of Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 34/2013 – consolidated text and 27/2014.
Criminal Procedure Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Official Gazette of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 35/03, 37/03, 56/03, 78/04, 28/05, 55/06, 27/07, 53/07, 9/09, 12/10, 8/13, 59/14.
Criminal Procedure Code of the Republika Srpska, Official Gazette of the Republika Srpska, no. 53/2012, 91/2017 and 66/2018.
Huvig v France, European Court of Human Rights, Application no. 11105/84, judgment of 24. 4. 1990.
Gančo v. Lithuania, Application no. 42168/19, the judgment of 13. 7. 2021.
Kruslin v. France, European Court of Human Rights, Application no. 11801/85, judgment of 24. 4. 1990.
Judgment of the Cantonal court of Goražde, no. 32 0 K 427600 24 Kž 2 of 3. 7. 2024.
Ramanuskas v. Lithuania, European Court of Human Rights, Application no. 74420/01, judgment of 5. 2. 2008.
Szabó and Vissy v. Hungary, European Court of Human Rights, Application no. 37138/14, Judgment of 12. 1. 2006.
Dragojević v. Republic of Croatia, European Court of Human Rights, Application no. 68955/11, Judgment of 15. 1. 2015.
Costello-Roberts v. The United Kingdom, European Court of Human Rights, Application no. 13134/87, judgment of 25. 3. 1993.
Ringwald v. Croatia, European Court of Human Rights, Application no. 14590/15, the judgment of 22. 1. 2019.
Valenzuela Contreras v. Spain, European Court of Human Rights, application no. 27671/95, judgment of 30. 7. 1998.
Weber & Saravia v. Germany, European Court of Human Rights, application no. 54934/00, decision on admissibility of 29. 6. 2006.