A "CONSTITUTION" WITHOUT A CONSTITUTION - THE ISRAELI EXPERIENCE

Avi Zamir
PhD, Faculties of Social Science & Law, University of Tel Aviv, Israel

A written comprehensive constitution, usually defined as “formal”, is not the only form the constitution might take. There are unwritten constitutions, such as in the UK and Israel, that include laws prescribing constitutional principles and landmark decisions of the Supreme Court. In the Israeli legal system, which has neither a written constitution nor an entrenched bill of rights, human rights guarantees are incorporated into the constitutional arena by a presumption developed by the Supreme Court based on the Israeli Declaration of Independence, which states that the country will be established “on the foundation of freedom”. In doing so, the court followed the “Background Understanding Model”. Under this model, which is similar to the interpretive theory in the USA, there is a general understanding of civil rights, human rights, the rule of law, separation of powers, and other fundamental principles. In March 1992, a significant event occurred in the Israeli constitutional arena. The Knesset (The Israeli Parliament) enacted the Basic Law Freedom of Occupation and Basic Law Human Dignity and Liberty. These laws formed a “Constitutional revolution” and imposed restrictions on the power of the Knesset to pass any law it pleased. In enacting those Basic Laws, Israel has joined the family of nations that believe that limitations must be set on the right of a majority to derogate from fundamental human rights. However, these fragile achievements might be under constant threat.

Keywords: A Constitution without a Constitution, Human Rights, Rule of Law, Separation of Powers, Basic Laws, Constitutional Revolution.

Barak, A. 2020. Human Rights in Times of Terror – A Judicial Point of View. In: Albert, R. and Roznai, Y. (eds.), Constitutionalism Under Extreme Conditions. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice. Cham, Springer, pp. 109-119. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49000-3_8

Barak-Erez, D. 1995. From an Unwritten to a Written Constitution: The Israeli Challenge in American Perspective. Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 26, pp. 309-355.

Edrey, Y.M. 2005. The Israeli Constitutional Revolution/Evolution, Models of Constitutions, and a Lesson from Mistakes and Achievements. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 53(1), pp. 77-124. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/53.1.77

Gavison, R. 1985. The Controversy over Israel’s Bill of Rights. Israel Yearbook of Human Rights, 15(1), pp. 113-154. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004422995_009

Grimm, D. 2012. Types of Constitutions. In: Rosenfeld, M. and Sajó, A. (eds.),  The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford Academic, pp. 98-132. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0006

Halmai, G. 2012. The Use of Foreign Law in Constitutional Interpretation. In: Rosenfeld, M. and Sajó, A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford Academic, pp. 1328-2348. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0066

Jacobsohn, G.J. 2012. Constitutional Values and Principles. In: Rosenfeld, M. and Sajó, A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford Academic, pp. 777-792. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0038

Leyland, P. 2016. The Constitution of the United Kingdom – A Contextual Analysis. 3rd ed. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781849469104

Lock, T. 2017. Human Rights Law in the UK After Brexit. Public Law, Vol. Nov Supp 2017, pp. 117-134. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3046554

Maoz, A. 1988. Defending Civil Liberties Without a Constitution – The Israeli Experience. Melbourne University Law Review, 16, pp. 815-836.

Navot, S. 2016. Constitutional Law in Israel. 2nd ed. Wolters Kluwer.

Roznai, Y. 2017. Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments: The Limits of Amendment Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Segal, Z. 1992. A Constitution Without a Constitution: The Israeli Experience and the American Impact. Capital University Law Review, 21(1), pp. 1-62.

Sartori, G. 1962. Constitutionalism: A Preliminary Discussion. American Political Science Review, 56(4), pp. 853-864. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952788

Shapira, A. 1983. Judicial Review Without a Constitution: The Israeli Paradox. Temple Law Quarterly, 56(2), pp. 405-462.

Tushnet, M. 2020. Taking Back the Constitution: Activist Judges and the Next Age of American Law. Yale: Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300252903

Weill, R. 2020. The Strategic Common Law Court of Aharon Barak and its Aftermath: On Judicially-Led Constitutional Revolutions and Democratic Backsliding. Law & Ethics of Human Rights, 14(2), p. 227-272. https://doi.org/10.1515/lehr-2020-2017

Legal sources and case law

Basic Law: Freedom of Occupation (Israel), https://knesset.gov.il/review/data/eng/law/kns13_basiclaw_occupation_eng.pdf

Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty (Israel). Available at: https://www.mfa.gov.il/mfa/mfa-archive/1992/pages/basic%20law-%20human%20dignity%20and%20liberty-.aspx (5. 9. 2023).

Basic Law: The Government. Available at: https://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/MFA-Archive/2001/Pages/Basic%20Law-%20The%20Government%20-2001-.aspx (5. 9. 2023).

Basic Law: The Knesset (Israel). Available at: https://main.knesset.gov.il/EN/activity/Documents/BasicLawsPDF/BasicLawTheKnesset.pdf (5. 9. 2023).

Civil Ap. 6821/93 United Mizrahi Bank Ltd. v Migdal Cooperative Village, 49(4) PD, p. 222 (1995) [Hebrew]. Available at: https://versa.cardozo.yu.edu/opinions/united-mizrahi-bank-v-migdal-cooperative-village  (5. 9. 2023).

Declaration of Independence (Israel). Available at:  https://main.knesset.gov.il/en/about/pages/declaration.aspx (5. 9. 2023).

HCJ 73/53 Kol Ha’am v Minister of the Interior, 7 PD 871 (1953) [Hebrew]. Available at: https://versa.cardozo.yu.edu/opinions/kol-haam-co-ltd-v-minister-interior (5. 9. 2023).

Marbury v Madison, 5 US 137 (1803).

Internet sources

IBA notice on Israel 2023. Available at: https://www.ibanet.org/Israel-The-IBA-is-profoundly-concerned-with-the-proposed-reforms-to-the-legal-system-that-would-jeopardise-the-Rule-of-Law

Download the article