Juanita Goicovici, PhD
Faculty of Law University Babeș-Bolyai of Cluj-Napoca, Romania

The paper focuses on the reverberations of the concept of ‘place of performance of the contractual obligations’ on the establishing of court’s jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, under the provisions of second indent of Article 7, para. (1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012, in the perimeter of air transportation. The first part of the article deals with the preliminary points that should be stated concerning the judicial action which falls within the concept of ‘matters relating to main contractual provisions’ within the meaning of Article 7(1)(a) of Regulation No 1215/2012, in the hypotheses which cover the claims brought by air passengers for compensation for the long delay of a connecting flight, made under Regulation No 261/2004, against an operating air carrier with which the passenger concerned does not have a contractual nexus. As emphasised in the second part of the paper, particularly in the field of contracts concluded for the provision of services (air transport), as reflected in CJEU recent jurisprudence (Case C-20/21), in the case of flight consisting of a confirmed single booking and performed in several flight segments by two separate air carriers, under the provisions of art. 7 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004, the common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, the claim for compensation brought against the air carrier operating that first flight segment falls under the territorial competence of the court from the place of arrival of that first flight. Thirdly, the reverberations of the place of contractual performance on determining the courts’ jurisdiction become ostensible since the place of arrival for that first flight segment may not be classified as a ‘place of contractual performance’ within the meaning of the legal provisions.

Keywords: contractual performance, jurisdiction, territorial competence, air transportation, passengers, right of compensation.

Činčurak Erceg, B. & Vasilj, A. 2019. Current Affairs in Passengers Rights Protection in the European Union. In: EU Law in Context – Adjustment to Membership and Challenges of the Enlargement. EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series 2. Available: (26. 9. 2022).

Fox, S. J. & Martin-Domingo, L. 2020. EU Air Passengers’ Rights Past, Present, And Future: In an Uncertain World (Regulation (EC) 261/2004: Evaluation and Case Study). Journal of Air Law and Commerce (JALC), 85(2), pp. 271-278.

Ginter, C, Härginen, K. & Linntam, A. 2019. Passengers Are Not Automatically Responsible for Fines Imposed on Airlines Estonian Court Declares a Lufthansa Standard Term Unfair. European Review of Private Law, 27(5), pp. 985-993.

Goicovici, J. 2022. Dreptul relațiilor dintre profesioniști și consumatori. Bucharest: Hamangiu.

Goicovici, J. 2021. Consumer’s Domicile, as a Criterion for the Selection of the Courts’ Territorial Competence. Efficiency of the Derogatory Unusual Terms. Analele Stiintifice ale Universitatii Alexandru Ioan Cuza din Iasi Stiinte Juridice. 47(2), pp. 71-83.

Goicovici, J., 2021. The inapplicability of personal exceptions between joint debtors and creditors under Romanian and French private law. In: Dalvinder, S, Popa Tache, C. E. & Săraru C.-S. (eds.). 2021. Looking for New Paths in Comparative and International Law. Bucharest: ADJURIS – International Academic Publisher, pp. 85-98.

Goicovici, J. 2020. Drepturile pasagerilor: zboruri anulate în circumstanțe excepționale. In: Dimitriu, O. (ed.). 2020. Probleme și soluții legale privind criza COVID-19. Bucharest: C. H. Beck, pp. 346-368.

Goicovici, J. 2019. Co-Active Performance, Good Faith versus Creditor’s Fault in the Matter of the Obligation of Moderating the Damage. Romanian Review of Private Law, 2019(3), pp. 183-196.

Julien, J. 2019. Droit de la consommation. 3rd ed. Paris: L.G.D.J.

Pap, A. 2016. Transportul aerian și drepturile pasagerilor în legislația Uniunii Europene. Sinteze de jurisprudență. Bucharest: Universul Juridic.

Pellier, J.-D. 2021. Droit de la consommation. 3rd ed. Paris: Dalloz.

Picod, N. & Picod, Y. 2020. Droit de la consommation. 5th ed. Paris: Sirey.

Piedelièvre, S. 2020. Droit de la consommation. 3rd ed. Paris: Economica.

Țiț, N.-H. 2022. A Potential Legality Problem of the Enforcement Procedure: The Prorogation of Jurisdiction in the Case of the Bailiff. Analele Stiintifice Ale Universitatii Alexandru Ioan Cuza Din Iasi – Stiinte Juridice, 68(1), pp. 145-163.

Țiț, N.-H. 2021. Certain Aspects Regarding the Parties’ Agreement in Civil Procedure. In: Challenges of the Knowledge Society. Bucharest: Nicolae Titulescu University Editorial House, 2021, pp. 305-310.

Țiț, N.-H. 2020. Încuviințarea executării silite a debitorului consumator-exigențe europene, realități naționale. Analele Științifice ale Universităţii Alexandru Ioan Cuza din Iași, seria Ştiinţe Juridice, 66(2), pp. 91-110.

Țiț, N.-H. & Stanciu, R. 2019. Legea nr. 310/2018 pentru modificarea şi completarea Legii nr. 134/2010 privind Codul de procedură civilă: comentarii, explicaţii, jurisprudenţă relevantă. Bucharest: Hamangiu.

Țiț, N.-H. 2018. Încuviințarea executării silite. Bucharest: Universul Juridic.

Țiț, N.-H. 2016. Executarea silită. Partea generală. Bucharest: Hamangiu.

Țiț, N.-H. 2015. How Far Have We Reached in European Cooperation in Civil Matters? A View on European Enforcement. CES Working Papers, Iasi: Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Centre for European Studies, 7(2), pp. 637-647.

Download the article